Confronting a traditional encyclopedia, prepared by experts, and a digital encyclopedia, collaborative, made by all, we're comparing antiquity with modernity nor democracy with meritocracy. Also we are establishing a comparison between individual and collective intelligence and emergent intelligence.
In some posts MDig, I already said more than once that people can be intelligent, but that mass, the group (in general) in both. However, h to emphasize this assertion, especially in this especfico theme. Most criticism kuzco lighting Wikipdia, so empty, made by people who know the esrio the collaborative aspect of the largest online encyclopedia. But the main criticism against the type wiki encyclopedias that they are based on the following premise: "a reality in which a sufficient number of people cr on something, that something becomes the truth." And this is true at some point. Because a wiki is based on the collaboration of all: the simple democracy of thought which states that an entry in the encyclopedia is one way or another. Most people, when they know the concept of wiki for the first time, higher than a website that can be edited by anyone in reliable due to the destructive contributions. Believe as offer sprays ink for free along with a newly painted white wall. The only result verossmil be ugly graffiti and public places, and most efforts in artsticos lasting sero. But the reality kuzco lighting that Wikipdia seems to work quite well. In fact, a study published kuzco lighting in the scientific journal Nature revealed that the standard of Article Wikipdia almost as accurate as the Encyclopedia of Britnica. Moreover kuzco lighting detected eight serious errors, such as misconceptions on important concepts; four in encyclopedia. The testers also found many factual errors, omissions or false such statements: 162 and 123 in Wikipdia and Britnica respectively. kuzco lighting The reason for the amazing success of Wikipdia kuzco lighting that around each theme comes a social network. These networks h co-contribute new unbiased and opportunistic free riders or information, those using the credibility of information provided by others for personal Purposes. If these were the only ones types of behavior would be easy to think that Wikipdia fail. But there is a third type of usurio: the vigilante. Thousands of vigilantes patrol the Wikipdia eliminating malicious personal contributions and leaving notes on the pages of discussion of the authors. Even unite to prevent certain users faam changes. Put another way, the Wikipdia works as any other social organization where our comprehension emerges spontaneously from the decentralized actions of the people kuzco lighting who form groups with interconnected destinations and common Purposes. The lies the reason for its success and credibility at the expense of the biased kuzco lighting opinion of his detractors.
Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year 2012 (wikipedia) Most viewed articles Wikipdia in 2012 (wikipedia) 25 best photos of the year Wikipdia (wikipedia) Wikipdia 10 years sharing the sum of all knowledge kuzco lighting (wikipedia) He was a man, woman and became're sorry now (4 photos) (Britannic) Britnica says j slept with over a thousand men (Britannic) Famlia britnica power go to jail for being autossustentvel (Britannic) Britnica has tongue lengthened to speak Korean can (Britannic) Nikki Lee, 25, j lay with five thousand men (Britannic)
Luiz Felipe on July 2, 2010 19:08:59 s' Okay, but Brazilian in wikipedia as well. There are groups that holds the control and think like Information This historical kuzco lighting facts and names of major cities with 5,000 inhabitants Noso, already read some people complaining that they insist on removing it feel important.
Tom S Guimaraes on July 1, 2010 23:28:29 s' Congratulations for positioning in defense of Wikipedia. I'm more than a user of this fabulous tool that technology has given us: my admiration for it puts me on the level of a hardcore f. Better yet know the quality that she has is beyond the limits of any admiration but alicerada kuzco lighting in a comparison with one of the most respected publications in the field. Equanto the Brittanica took decades and decades more to gain the credibility you deserve, Wikipedia reached this level in a few short years. This translates into two words: honesty and competence.
Moonwalker kuzco lighting on July 1, 2010 10:36:07 s' Well, the fact that the organizers prprios traditional encyclopedias admit that some articles were written with errors - the crass, obviously - but existing. Wikipedia, at least in Portuguese, has very interesting articles in general.
Tyr 01 ju
No comments:
Post a Comment