But gee what fools. Maybe you had opted out of having sex with an HIV infection if you knew that th

RISK ASSESSMENT: Being HIV positive and have sex without telling their sickness becomes legal in Sweden, the appeals court decided. The risk of infection is transmitted is not high enough for proper medication, the Court considers. bulb fiction Photo: Ejbsf / CC BY-NC-ND
LAW & LAW. After an intense campaign to legalize hivspridning now choosing appeals bulb fiction court to exonerate a man accused of having bulb fiction unprotected sex with a woman without telling us that he had HIV. According to the Court of Appeal need not tell you about their HIV infection if you also go on treatment for the disease.
The Court of Appeal in Skåne who now choose to free an immigrant who had been convicted in the District Court for attempted bulb fiction reckless endangerment of another after having had unprotected sex with four women without telling bulb fiction about their illness, writes Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet.
According to the Court of Appeals is the man indeed liable for the offense, but the behavior is not criminal because the man were medicated for his illness during the time that he had sex with women. Therefore, the risk of the virus spreading is not high enough, consider the Court of Appeal, for conduct to be regarded as criminal.
Rules: Keep a good tone. Defamation, intimidation, publication of personal data, vulgar posts and irrelevant statements about groups of people that do not have obvious with the article to be removed and may result in blocking. Posts may well be controversial bulb fiction but stay on topic and follow bulb fiction Swedish law.
and who the hell checks that HIV man takes his 20 tablets daily life!? How the hell can he be freed when he actually violated the law regardless of infection!?
But gee what fools. Maybe you had opted out of having sex with an HIV infection if you knew that the person has been infected. Has it gone so far with PK that you can not even get to opt out of these infected people? Nooo understand that it would well seem so offensive to an HIV-infected that DO get pröjsa too much after all notifications would be filed. IT is well more important than you may protect yourself against this person.
It is becoming increasingly clear that they are taking all the measures to eradicate Sweden as a nation in general and Swedes in particular. May the all that is meant for us befall those who make decisions and those who propagate these decisions!
It's fucking the sickest I've heard in a long time. Does the Swedes to be mad? or far too timid to speak up about anything at all? We all sounds bulb fiction the idiotic determine in this country ....
Rainbow flag and rainbows belong to all the world, and not exclusively gay o gay population. Rainbow colors were cut for a number of years ago by different actors and arranged on fabric in the form of streaks. Among those first users were hippies in San Francisco in the '60s.
No, absolutely not. It is incredibly common among you "gay conspiracy theorists" to attach all the "gay lobby", whether bulb fiction it is the "dissolution of the family norm" or whatever.

Why choose FT to illustrate the article bulb fiction with a rainbow flag? No one who is considering whether FT is in fact a right-wing, populist rag, rather than a "provider of true, uncensored news"? bulb fiction I only ask because you smartasses in here seem to think that you are "going to take Sweden back." Good to know how you think, you will govern our country forward. I get so disgusted with you, the shame of Sweden.
"I guess because bögmakt movement has pushed the issue so fanatically (RFSU etc..) '.
- No, far from it. Lobbying is legal and common in Sweden, albeit somewhat questionable (just like the links between bulb fiction a brainwashing machine that sentiment FT and the most successful and housebroken brown-party)
- Assuming bulb fiction that you are being sarcastic.
- Me too. Lobbying (both commercial and political) is a powerful driving force in modern society. The driving force behind lobbying driven organizations and companies varies. Above all, in many cases, capital controls, particularly genuine interest in something. It may seem unfair, but it is an inevitable part of an open society with a (relatively) free market forces. The criminalization of a disease I think, however, for reasons of principle, is completely wrong.
- Absolutely not! I welcome discussion. FT are however constantly scapegoating and stigmatizing. It is the guiding principle. The worldview I do not support. However, I miss the open discussions of, for example, immigration policy in other media.
I believe that lobbying is undemocratic and should in every case be made illegal, there is corruption and bribery o